CEG experts apply economic and finance techniques to solve complex issues and present robust arguments in competition cases, regulatory issues and disputes across all sectors.Learn how we can help
CEG experts get to the heart of the issue. We will develop a clear line of reasoning based on a thorough economic analysis of the facts of the case, in its right legal and economic context.Learn how we can help
CEG brings together senior professionals with experience in industry, consultancy and academia to offer insightful and dependable advice on key corporate decisions.
CEG’s approach to developing economic evidence for Article 101 cases mirrors the “robust and compelling” threshold set by Courts. We always test the theory of harm and we seek to provide causal evidence whether in defence of or complaining against conduct. For example, CEG experts question the impact of information exchange on competitive outcomes and whether specific allegations could lead to anti-competitive outcomes.Nils von Hinten-Reed, Managing Director
The scope of Competition authorities’ cases against Big Tech companies is too narrow, and decisions take too much time, to be effective. Key issues for the coming years will be market access, imposing of unfair trading conditions and non-pecuniary damages.Dr Rob Vossen, Director
Damages work is like a duck paddling water, most of the action happens under water. Whilst in our experience almost all cartel cases are nowadays litigated, most of our cases are settled favourably and never see the insides of a court.Fred Wandschneider, Director
When assessing potential abuses of dominant positions, one must take great care to identify the relevant market. Market definition should never be viewed as a means to an end but must be tailored to the issue under investigation.Fabian Rinnen, Senior Advisor